DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002686949-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-28

000118517

Contested design: 002686949-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 002686949-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Intellectual Property MTÜvia PDF extraction

EE

Tartu mnt 67/1-13b, 10115 Tallinn, Estland

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Holder · RCD owner

Technische Universität Darmstadt Staatliche Materialprüfungsanstalt Darmstadt Fachgebiet und Institut für Werkstoffkunde

Germany (DE)

Grafenstr. 2, 64283 Darmstadt, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

website excerpts showing the 'MPA Darmstadt If W' logo on a blue rectangular background

https://web.archive.org/web/20051029205616/http://www.mpa-ifw.tu-darmstadt.de/ · Internet Archive Wayback Machine / mpa-ifw.tu-darmstadt.de · disclosed 2005-10-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on earlier web disclosures of D1 showing the same logo before the 22 April 2015 filing date.
  • The holder was given an opportunity to comment on the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Wayback Machine website extracts as disclosure under Article 7 and found D1 publicly available before the contested design's filing date.
  • Comparing the two designs directly, the Division found no perceptible differences, so the contested design lacked novelty and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328