DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008610497-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-17

000117978

Contested design: 008610497-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 008610497-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008610497-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jinhe Lanvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 9 Tongren Road, Chengdong Community Committee, Huliao Town, Dapu County, Meizhou City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Iannis Roman

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Minbo Trading Co., Ltd

China (CN)

405, Fengze Garden, Tantou Village, Songgang, Songgang Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen, 518000, China

Represented by

André Guerreiro Rodrigues

Prior art cited (1)

National design

detectors

Chinese design patent registration No 201730654551.4 · Chinese design patent registration excerpt · disclosed 2018-07-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested radar design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier Chinese design patent No 201730654551.4 published before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to file observations but did not respond to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the earlier design as disclosed, found at least average designer freedom, and held that the minor visual differences did not change the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico DERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108