DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008466486-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-13

000118258

Contested design: 008466486-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered Community design No 008466486-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008466486-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Disteco GmbHvia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Buxera 22a, 6837 Weiler, Österreich

Represented by

Stefan Lausegger

Holder · RCD owner

aqotec GmbH

Austria (AT)

Vöcklatal 35, 4890 Weißenkirchen im Attergau, Österreich

Represented by

Clemens Thiele

Prior art cited (1)

OtherD1

DISTECO logo

email correspondence and business use · disclosed 2020-12-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested logo lacked novelty and individual character over earlier logo D1 and also invoked earlier sign and copyright rights.
  • The holder denied valid disclosure and design relevance of the cited material, maintained the contested design was new and individual, and disputed any protectable DISTECO sign or copyright ownership.
  • The Division found D1 had been disclosed before filing through dated invoices, emails, and surrounding evidence, making it part of the prior design corpus.
  • Given broad design freedom for logos, the minor colour differences did not change the overall impression because both designs shared the same mirrored triangles and DISTECO word element.
  • The application was upheld on Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6(1)(b), so the Division did not examine the other pleaded grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328