DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007015144-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-30

000117492

Contested design: 007015144-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design 007015144-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wang Jianvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.38, Group 6, Dongshan Village, Huichun Town, Yilong County, Sichuan Province, China

Holder · RCD owner

Zhuhai Hong Tong Tong Cross-border Business Electronics Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Rm.105-43143, No.6, Baohua Rd., Hengqin New Dist., Zhuhai, China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

pens

Community design registration No 006689576-0002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-08-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Community design for pens published before the contested filing date.
  • The applicant argued colours, materials, and attached brands or labels in the prior design should be disregarded because the contested design was the reference point.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD was validly disclosed and that the designs produced the same overall impression on the informed user despite a minor metallic-tip difference.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.0419.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130967

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127580

vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ

2025-10-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129366

vs FHU Jarosław Wolski

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129423

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198