DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006954467-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-04-04

000118920

Contested design: 006954467-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 006954467-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mitavo GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Hofrat-Röhrer-Straße 14, 86161 Augsburg, Deutschland

Represented by

Inde® Rechtsanwälte

Dr. Oliver S. Hartmann

Holder · RCD owner

Breuer & Schillings GbR

Germany (DE)

Adenauerstraße 20 (A2), 52146 Würselen, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

card holder

ASIN B00BGTMHPU · amazon.de · disclosed 2013-02-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on D1, an Amazon-disclosed earlier card holder design.
  • The holder argued that late-filed additional materials were inadmissible, disclosure of the earlier designs was unproven, and the contested design differed especially in its opaque closed back.
  • The Division excluded the later-submitted materials that introduced other prior designs, but accepted D1 as disclosed through the Amazon listing, ASIN, and pre-filing reviews.
  • It found the shared front-side features dominated the overall impression, the back-side differences did not create individual character, and the contested design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038