DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008533418-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-27

000118557

Contested design: 008533418-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008533418-0002 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Schneid Gesellschaft m.b.H.via PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Gewerbering 16, 8054 Pirka, Österreich

Represented by

Stefan Lausegger

Holder · RCD owner

aqotec Holding GmbH

Austria (AT)

Vöcklatal 35, 4890 Weißenkirchen im Attergau, Österreich

Represented by

Clemens Thiele

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

SCHNEID word logo used on Facebook posts, an archived website, and a catalog

Facebook; schneid.at via Internet Archive; SCHNEID catalog

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested logo design lacked novelty because an identical SCHNEID logo had been publicly disclosed before 7 May 2021, and also invoked other invalidity grounds.
  • Holder denied exact identity and sufficient publication, argued the cited materials were not design-relevant prior art, sought rejection, and requested a stay pending a related appeal.
  • The Division refused a stay, accepted the Facebook posts, catalog, and Wayback capture as proof that D1 was publicly disclosed, and held a logo can qualify as an earlier design.
  • Because the word elements were identical, the contested RCD lacked novelty; the invalidity application was upheld and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328