DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009169998-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-21

000121403

Contested design: 009169998-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0091699980001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Zhang Shenglongvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Xindu Village, Yuyang Town, Pingyang County, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province 325000, China

Represented by

Tom Palmisano

Holder · RCD owner

Zhichao Yu

China (CN)

No. 88, Dongzeng, Dongfeng Village, Duwei Town, Xianyou County, Fujian Province, China

Represented by

Jesús Eladio Sánchez Silva

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Biudxbo Electric Lice Comb

ASIN B09 V78 NX2V · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2022-03-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an Amazon listing for the Biudxbo Electric Lice Comb available from 10 March 2022.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations, so the disclosure evidence and the applicant's comparison points were uncontested.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as a prior public disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and treated the enlarged images as showing the same earlier design.
  • It found only immaterial differences, held that the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user, and invalidated the design for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.10

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123279

vs Jure MARKIČ

2024-05-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123434

vs Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2024-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308