DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000624697-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-10-11

000121542

Contested design: 000624697-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0006246970001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

REBOMA trgovina in gradbeništvo, d.o.o.via PDF extraction

SI

Cesarjeva ulica 29, 8000 Novo mesto, Slovenia

Represented by

Jure Marn

Holder · RCD owner

3S SPORT d.o.o.via PDF extraction

SI

Perovo 25, 1240 Kamnik, Slovenia

Represented by

Marjan Pipan

Prior art cited (16)

Patent

coin dispenser for storing and taking coins

CN 2845035Y / application No 200520130517.9 · China · disclosed 2005-11-04

CatalogD1⚠ rejected as evidence

purse shown in the Beijing Royal Aviation Technology catalogue 2005

Beijing Royal Aviation Technology catalogue

National designD2⚠ rejected as evidence

coin dispenser

French model No 98211 · France

National designD3⚠ rejected as evidence

purse

French design No 020473 · France

National designD4⚠ rejected as evidence

purse

French design No 12408 · France

Web disclosureD5⚠ rejected as evidence

Asoma wallet design

Asoma website / leaflet

Web disclosureD6⚠ rejected as evidence

Asoma coin-holder wallet design

Asoma page

Prior useD7⚠ rejected as evidence

wallet design allegedly displayed at SMAU 2002 in Milan

Secure Project / SMAU 2002 show

Prior useD8⚠ rejected as evidence

SDSP dispenser wallet

Marsupio €-Bag Dispenser Tagli Monete · SDSP page and invoices

OtherD9⚠ rejected as evidence

wallet design shown only in the reasoned statement

Web disclosureD10⚠ rejected as evidence

wallet design from Athrisi website

http://athrisi.gr · Wayback Machine / athrisi.gr · disclosed 2002-08-02

Web disclosureD11⚠ rejected as evidence

coin dispenser design from Athrisi website

http://athrisi.gr · Wayback Machine / athrisi.gr · disclosed 2002-08-02

Web disclosureD12⚠ rejected as evidence

purse design shown only in frontal view

http://www.fuxiafor.it · Wayback Machine / fuxiafor.it · disclosed 2003-02-02

Web disclosureD13⚠ rejected as evidence

purse design shown only in frontal view

http://www.fuxiafor.it · Wayback Machine / fuxiafor.it · disclosed 2003-02-02

Web disclosureD14⚠ rejected as evidence

SDSP Marsupion Eurobag wallet design

Wayback Machine / SDSP page · disclosed 2003-02-09

Web disclosureD15⚠ rejected as evidence

SDSP Marsupion Eurobag wallet design

SDSP page

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Articles 25(1)(b), 8(1) and 6, arguing the wallet design was technically dictated and lacked individual character over multiple earlier purse and coin-dispenser designs.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted that some coin-dispenser features were technically dictated, but found not all visible features of the contested design were solely dictated by technical function.
  • The Division found none of the invoked earlier designs had been properly disclosed with sufficiently reliable evidence for an Article 6 comparison before the priority or filing date.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)037
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)037
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)037
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)037
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)037
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)037
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)037
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)037