DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008741854-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-11-15

000119517

Contested design: 008741854-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0087418540001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Zimu Ruoyan Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

406, Jinyucheng Building, Bantian Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

H&A

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Kalinuo Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No. 1309, Building 33, Nanyuan New Village, Meilong Avenue, Minzhi Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Sanlinkee Alarm Clock

ASIN B08 5ZL HC4N · amazon.de · disclosed 2021-02-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on an alarm clock allegedly sold online before the contested design's filing date.
  • The applicant argued the prior Amazon-listed clock disclosed all relevant features; the holder filed no observations and left the application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de printout as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) and found the only difference, the word 'Tinload', immaterial.
  • The contested design lacked novelty, so the invalidity application was upheld and the design was declared invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108