DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008333272-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-03-12

000121140

Contested design: 008333272-0007

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0083332720007 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Κωνσταντίνος Παπαπαναγιώτουvia PDF extraction

GR

1st Odos Tagaradon, 57000 Thermi, Greece

Represented by

Nikolaos Papaletsos

Holder · RCD owner

Functional Backpacks LTDvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

The White House Greenall’s Avenue, Warrington, Cheshire, WA4 6HL, United Kingdom

Represented by

Wilson Gunn (Europe)

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnnex 1

Anthrax Deployment backpack shown on the applicant’s Instagram profile

Anthrax Machines Instagram profile · disclosed 2020-01-22

Web disclosureAnnex 2

Anthrax Deployment backpack shown on the applicant’s Facebook profile

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3009833432369181&set=pcb.3009878055698052 · Anthrax Machines Facebook profile · disclosed 2020-02-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing the contested design copied its earlier Anthrax Deployment backpack disclosed online before filing.
  • The holder disputed disclosure and argued the screenshots were incomplete or unverifiable; it also maintained that differences preserved novelty and individual character.
  • The Division accepted the Instagram and Facebook disclosures as prior art under Article 7(1) and treated only the clearly claimed central backpack panel as protected.
  • Comparing that protected panel with the earlier design, the Division found only immaterial differences and held the contested design not new, so the application succeeded in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038