Invalidity · first instance · 2024-03-12
000123196
Contested design: 015002025-0001
Outcome
The application for invalidity is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text(de)
1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 015002025-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Shenzen Aiwo Pet Supplies Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction
China (CN)
Room 301, Building 15, Longwangmiao Industrial Building, Baishixia village, FuYong St, BaoAn Dist, Shenzhen City, Guangdong, China
Represented by
André Guerreiro Rodrigues
Holder · RCD owner
Haoyu Wang
Germany (DE)
Antonie-Boetzelen-Ring 141, 41179 Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
Prior art cited (1)
Chinese design for pet brushes / dog combs
CN 307341908 S / 2022 3 0062344 / Patentnummer 7359661 · China National Intellectual Property Administration database · disclosed 2022-05-13
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on its earlier Chinese design disclosure published before the contested filing date.
- ›The holder was invited to comment on the invalidity application but submitted no observations.
- ›The Division found the earlier Chinese design had been validly disclosed under Article 7 CDR before the contested design filing date.
- ›It held that the compared brush designs created the same overall impression; colour and bristle differences were secondary to the near-identical overall form and element positioning.
- ›The application was upheld on lack of individual character, the contested design was invalidated, and costs were awarded against the holder.
Deciding panel
- MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
- MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
- MemberNatascha GALPERIN
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| deGerman | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000129301 vs Yu Bao | 2026-01-23 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000129536 vs WENJIU YANG | 2025-10-28 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000129724 vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd. | 2025-10-20 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000124016 vs EDIESI | 2024-09-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000124036 vs EDIESI | 2024-09-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000124035 vs EDIESI | 2024-09-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000123279 vs Jure MARKIČ | 2024-05-29 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000123434 vs Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd. | 2024-04-30 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |