DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009109721-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-09

000122575

Contested design: 009109721-0007

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009109721-0007 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Blackcoco's GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Neckarsulmer Str. 59, 74076 Heilbronn, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Bing Livia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

23 Brynawelon road, Cardiff Cardiff [Caerdydd GB-CRD] CF23 6qr, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon offer for the KONO Twin Wheels Travel Suitcase

ASIN B08 3J3 JX2K · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-01-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an Amazon listing showing the same suitcase before the filing date.
  • Holder argued the earlier Amazon product was its own design and should benefit from the grace period, and maintained the contested design should remain registered.
  • The Division found the Amazon listing proved disclosure from 2020-01-08, well outside the 12-month grace period, so the prior design formed part of the prior art.
  • Because the two suitcase designs created the same overall impression on the informed user, the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038