DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015007030-0010

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-11

000124015

Contested design: 015007030-0010

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 015007030-0010. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Flexi-Bogdahn Technik GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Carl-Benz-Weg 13, 22941 Bargteheide, Alemania

Holder · RCD owner

Ediesi SLvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Paseo Ronda, 88 bajo, 03660 Novelda, España

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

animal leashes

RCD No 01987181-0001 · Boletín de Dibujos y Modelos Comunitarios · disclosed 2013-06-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, and also alleged bad faith, relying primarily on earlier RCD D1 for dog leashes.
  • The holder argued the contested design was new and had individual character, denied bad faith, and pointed to prior public-domain leash patents and product differences.
  • The Division held bad faith and unfair competition were outside this invalidity ground, accepted D1 as disclosed, and assessed individual character under Article 6 CDR first.
  • It found the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user; minor differences in logo, colors, buckle, and waste-bag dispenser did not confer individual character.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested RCD was invalidated on the basis of D1, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidated306
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidated306
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidated306
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidated306
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidated306
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidated306
000123279

vs Jure MARKIČ

2024-05-29REUD invalidated306
000123434

vs Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2024-04-30REUD invalidated306