DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015036941-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-18

000125641

Contested design: 015036941-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the registered Community design No 015036941-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 015036941-0001. 3. Las costas sufragadas por la titular, fijadas en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Liangkun Chenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

n.º 46-2, Chencuo Weir, Qiancun Village, Mabi Town, Lianjiang County, Fujian Provincia, China

Represented by

Tong Yang SLU

Holder · RCD owner

Aphro Leather Goods Incvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

30 N Gmold St Ste R, Sheridan, wy 82801 Estados Unidos

Represented by

Brettschneider rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH

Jörg Brettschneider

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon.fr listing for a toiletry bag ("Grand poche de tocador marron, trousse de tocador pour homme...")

ASIN B0BR9V9V7T · Amazon.fr · disclosed 2022-12-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier online disclosure of a toiletry bag on Amazon.fr before 13 October 2023.
  • The holder was invited to comment on the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.fr listing as sufficient disclosure under Article 7 and found the compared bags highly similar in shape, contours, proportions, zippers, and side handle.
  • With at least medium designer freedom, minor material and color differences did not change the overall impression; the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberCollin para manuel
  • MemberRebecca Santana Davies

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038