DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008372403-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-29

000126498

Contested design: 008372403-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008372403-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shantou Linglan Electronic Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 6 Xinjian Road, Duting Village, Lianxia Town, Chenghai District, Shantou China

Represented by

LLR

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Jinyu Outdoor Products Co., Ltd

China (CN)

No. 13, Lane 6, Qi Cai Economic Society, Yiqun Village, Shiling Town, Huadu District, Guangzhou 510800 China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 1

Hyper pet grab tabs dog soccer ball with straps

https://www.amazon.com; ASIN B 08H 4BQ C8W · Amazon · disclosed 2020-08-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested dog soccer ball lacked individual character over an earlier Amazon-disclosed soccer ball with green grab tabs and a hanging strap.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted Annex 1 as sufficient internet disclosure before 28/12/2020 under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • It found the common soccer-ball features weak, and the paw-print ornamentation, tab number, strap colour, seams, and texture created a different overall impression.
  • The application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.12

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131828

vs Weiming Li

2026-04-21Art 25(1)(b)307
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000123997

vs EDIESI SL

2024-09-04305