DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015002802-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-04-21

000131828

Contested design: 015002802-0001

EUDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against EU design No 015002802-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen EU-Geschmacksmusters Nr. 015002802-0001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Chaline Liuvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Neuss, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Weiming Li

China (CN)

Shaoyang, Hunan, China

Represented by

Dimitris Morides

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnlage 1⚠ rejected as evidence

pet bed shown as 'AniOne Höhle fluffy 2-in-1 grau XS'

Fressnapf website

Prior useAnlagen 3-5⚠ rejected as evidence

pet bed allegedly sold to a customer by Calia GmbH

Calia GmbH, Deutschland · disclosed 2022-02-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant alleged lack of novelty and individual character based on an identical pet bed allegedly available in Germany before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to comment on the application but filed no observations.
  • The Division found the website printout undated and incomplete, and the affidavit, invoice, and photos insufficiently linked to the alleged earlier disclosure.
  • Because disclosure under Article 7 was not proven, the invalidity grounds failed and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberGailé SAKALAITE-ORLOVSKIENE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000126498

vs Guangzhou Jinyu Outdoor Products Co., Ltd

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)307
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000123997

vs EDIESI SL

2024-09-04305