DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000050117-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-05-21

000124595

Contested design: 000050117-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 000050117-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jiangsu Sanjo Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Changzhou, Jiangsu, China

Holder · RCD owner

Thetford LLC

United States (US)

Wilmington, United States

Represented by

Jak France

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested design was not a valid design under Article 3(1) EUDR because the seven views contained irreconcilable inconsistencies and lacked sufficient clarity.
  • Holder replied that the alleged discrepancies concerned disclaimed broken-line features or expected perspective and contour variations, so the views still depicted one unitary toilet bench design.
  • The Invalidity Division found each alleged inconsistency explainable by viewpoint, contour rendering, or the treatment of unclaimed features, and considered the views coherent when read together.
  • The application under Article 25(1)(a) EUDR was rejected because the contested design remained clearly identifiable as a single product satisfying Article 3(1) EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124615

vs Thetford LLC

2025-06-26Art 25(1)(a)237
000118299

vs Robert Kaleski

2023-05-15235
000114484

vs CHUDĚJ, s.r.o.

2021-10-21Art 25(1)(a)235
000113025

vs CANALONES CASTILLA S.L.

2021-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(a)235
000113061

vs CANALONES CASTILLA S.L.

2021-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(a)235
000113027

vs CANALONES CASTILLA S.L.

2021-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(a)235
000113026

vs CANALONES CASTILLA S.L.

2021-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(a)235
000104879

vs Robert Kaleski

2020-06-25235