DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003475052-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-09-04

000126579

Contested design: 003475052-0001

EUDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, EU design No 003475052-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 003475052-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

KWB Germany GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stuhr, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

iFixit GmbH

Germany (DE)

Stuttgart, Deutschland

Represented by

KPW PartmbB

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Amazon product page for the iFixit Pro Tech Toolkit / tool holder

https://www.amazon.com/ifixit-pro-tech-toolkit.electronics/dp/B01GF0KV6G/ ; ASIN B01GF0KV6G · amazon.com · disclosed 2015-11-21

Web disclosureD2

Additional screenshot showing the same iFixit product appearance on Amazon

amazon.com · disclosed 2015-11-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on Amazon screenshots of an earlier iFixit toolkit disclosure.
  • The holder argued D1 was undated, could have been altered later on Amazon, the first delivery was later, and the grace period under Article 7(2) applied.
  • The Division found the Amazon evidence objectively sufficient to show public disclosure of D1 by 21 November 2015 and held that the holder did not rebut that disclosure.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found the same overall impression for the informed user, with only negligible differences and broad designer freedom.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038