DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003475052-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-09-04

000126580

Contested design: 003475052-0003

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; EU design No 003475052-0003 is declared invalid and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 003475052-0003 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

KWB Germany GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stuhr, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

iFixit GmbH

Germany (DE)

Stuttgart, Deutschland

Represented by

KPW PartmbB

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Amazon webpage showing the iFixit Pro Tech Toolkit / tool bag

https://www.amazon.com/ifixit-pro-tech-toolkit.electronics/dp/B01GF0KV6G (ASIN B01GF0KV6G) · Amazon · disclosed 2015-11-21

Web disclosureD2

Additional screenshot of the same iFixit tool bag product

Screenshot of the same product as shown on 25/11/2015 · Amazon · disclosed 2015-11-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicants argued that the contested tool bag lacked novelty and individual character over Amazon disclosures D1 and D2 and also raised a non-unity objection.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, challenged the dating and reliability of the Amazon screenshots, invoked the Article 7(2) grace period, and denied any non-unity.
  • The Division accepted D1 and D2 as internet disclosures available before the filing date and found the grace-period defence unproven.
  • It held that the compared tool bags created the same overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was invalidated, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000126624

vs iFixit GmbH

2025-09-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)0310
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038