DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008832828-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-01

000129229

Contested design: 008832828-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 008832828-0001 is declared invalid. 2. The holder bears the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Chaline Liuvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Neuss, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Wenbo Huang

China (CN)

Shenzhen, China

Represented by

dp Rechtsanwälte

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon listing for the MINGHOO Damen Geldborse handbag

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B09PBQ4MLM · Amazon · disclosed 2021-12-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on Amazon listings showing the same bag before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient internet disclosure from 27 December 2021 under Article 7(1) EUDR.
  • It found the prior design and contested bag produced the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR.
  • The application was upheld, the design was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to bear costs fixed at EUR 350.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038