DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009029689-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-03

000129422

Contested design: 009029689-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 009029689-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Absina GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Buchen, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Suizhou Shenghe Trading Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Suizhou, Hubei, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

snap hook with two textile straps

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B 08D 3LK GX3 · Amazon · disclosed 2020-08-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Amazon disclosure of a similar snap-hook strap product.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient internet evidence of disclosure since 19/08/2020 under Article 7(1) EUDR.
  • It found the contested design produced the same overall impression as the prior design, so it lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.0709.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028