DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015087587-0010

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-04-07

000129039

Contested design: 015087587-0010

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; registered EU design No. 015087587-0010 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 015087587-0010 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mercedes-Benz Group AGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stuttgart, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Robu Aktiengesellschaft

Switzerland (CH)

Appenzell, Schweiz

Represented by

Jochen Herrmann

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Mercedes-Maybach S-Class passenger car design shown in a press kit

https://media.mercedes-benz.com/en/press-kit/846ee20d-5879-4e01-82f3-391785dd36f0 · Mercedes-Benz media website press kit · disclosed 2020-11-19

Trade mark

EU trademark No. 14 921 027

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier disclosures, and also invoked its earlier EU trademark rights.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, argued the contested car design created a different overall impression, and requested amended maintenance without the claimed logo.
  • The Division accepted D1 as a public web disclosure from 19 November 2020 and found market saturation was unproven despite functional and regulatory constraints on car design.
  • Comparing the visible features, the Division held the contested design produced no different overall impression from D1, so the design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvo TSENKOV

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129036

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128