DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015087587-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-04-07

000129076

Contested design: 015087587-0006

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, EU design No. 015087587-0006 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 015087587-0006 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mercedes-Benz Group AGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stuttgart, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Robu Aktiengesellschaft

Switzerland (CH)

Appenzell, Schweiz

Represented by

Jochen Herrmann

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Mercedes-Maybach S-Class passenger car shown in a Mercedes-Benz press kit

https://media.mercedes-benz.com/press-kit/846ee20d-5879-4e01-82f3-391785dd36f0 · media.mercedes-benz.com · disclosed 2020-11-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character and also relied on MAYBACH mark-related objections, submitting D1 as a web disclosure dated 19 November 2020.
  • The holder disputed that D1 had been validly disclosed, argued the contested design created a different overall impression, and alternatively requested maintenance without the logo and the word element 'MAYBACH'.
  • The Division accepted D1 as publicly disclosed internet evidence and found that the shared contours, proportions, lighting, grille, body lines, and two-tone finish outweighed the design differences.
  • The contested design was found to lack individual character over D1, so the invalidity application was granted and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvo TSENKOV

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129036

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128