Invalidity · first instance · 2026-04-07
000129077
Contested design: 015087587-0007
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text(de)
1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 015087587-0007 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Mercedes-Benz Group AGvia PDF extraction
Germany (DE)
Stuttgart, Deutschland
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
Robu Aktiengesellschaft
Switzerland (CH)
Appenzell, Schweiz
Represented by
Jochen Herrmann
Prior art cited (1)
Mercedes-Maybach S-Class passenger car shown in a press-kit webpage contribution
https://media.mercedes-benz.com/press-kit/846ee20d-5879-4e01-82f3-391785dd36f0 · media.mercedes-benz.com · disclosed 2020-11-19
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying principally on prior disclosure D1 and also alleging use of its MAYBACH marks.
- ›The holder disputed disclosure of some earlier designs, argued the contested design created a different overall impression, and requested amended maintenance without the logo and MAYBACH word element.
- ›The Division found D1 was validly disclosed online on 19 November 2020 and that the holder did not rebut that disclosure.
- ›Comparing the designs from the informed user's perspective, the Division held their overall impressions were essentially the same and the cited differences were insufficient.
- ›The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs of EUR 750 were awarded against the holder.
Deciding panel
- MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
- MemberNatascha GALPERIN
- MemberIvo TSENKOV
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deGerman | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000124336 vs Radosław Pryba | 2026-05-27 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129038 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129055 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000128979 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129039 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129076 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129075 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129036 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |