DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008837884-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-27

000124336

Contested design: 008837884-0004

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 008837884-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

KCT GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Robert-Bosch-Str. 30, 72348 Rosenfeld, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Radosław Pryba

Poland (PL)

Kolejowa 15, 67-300 Szprotawa, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

prior profile design evidenced by a technical drawing, AWW invoices, and a photograph

profile 03673 · AWW · disclosed 2007-01-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on an earlier disclosed profile design supported by a technical drawing, invoices, and a photograph accepted after remittal from the Board of Appeal.
  • The holder argued the comparison should reflect the end user of the product, that visible finish differences were decisive, and that the shared features were technical or invisible in normal use.
  • The Invalidity Division found the prior design had been sufficiently disclosed, defined the informed user by reference to sun visors and vehicle profiles, and considered the designer's freedom at least average.
  • It held that the extensive similarities in cross-sectional structure and arrangement of essential features outweighed minor detailing differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberChiara BORACE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129036

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128