DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015117248-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-08

000132044

Contested design: 015117248-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015117248-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Yikang Hi-Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Tong Yang SLU

Holder · RCD owner

Xucan XU

China (CN)

Lianrao Town, Raoping County, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Emilio Manfred Zeininger

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

electric massagers

CN 305404609 S · patent database · disclosed 2019-10-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over Chinese design patent CN 305404609 S, published before the contested design filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier design was disclosed on 25/10/2019 and compared both head massager designs from the informed user perspective.
  • Given the at least average degree of design freedom, minor detail differences did not change the same overall impression, so individual character was lacking.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was invalidated in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailé SAKALAITE-ORLOVSKIENE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128157

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288