DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 015120538-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-09

000132124

Contested design: 015120538-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and registered EU design No 015120538-0002 is declared invalid; the holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015120538-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jinbin Yuanvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Foshan, Guangdong, China

Holder · RCD owner

Hong Zheng

China (CN)

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Sach & Associates

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Massager by Mocoli — electric handheld/body-contact massager with four flexible legs

https://www.amazon.de, ASIN B0FWK2KB5N · amazon.de · disclosed 2025-10-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant (Jinbin Yuan) argued that the contested massager design lacks individual character in view of the Mocoli 'Massager' disclosed on Amazon.de on 16/10/2025, before the contested design's filing date (18/10/2025), sharing the same rectangular top, four legs, metallic borders and control panel configuration.
  • Holder did not submit observations.
  • The Division found the prior design duly disclosed before the filing date; comparing the designs from two perspective views, the contested design shares the same overall shape, housing proportions, extremities and materials; a belt visible in the prior design and oval pads visible in the contested design's bottom view are insufficient to distinguish them.
  • Application upheld; contested design declared invalid for lack of individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132105

vs Hong Zheng

2026-06-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288