DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015080114-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-22

000130164

Contested design: 015080114-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is granted, the registered EU design No. 015080114-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 015080114-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten, die auf EUR 720 festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Holder · RCD owner

Moritz Neugebauer

Germany (DE)

Friedrichstraße 155, 10117 Berlin, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

National designD1

Hair Clipper

CN202330740862.8 · CNIPA · disclosed 2024-07-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based mainly on earlier Chinese design D1 for a hair clipper published before the contested design's filing date.
  • The holder disputed disclosure in the European Union, argued its own later CNIPA design showed originality, and maintained the contested design created a different overall impression.
  • The Division held CNIPA publication of D1 on 19 July 2024 was sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1), and the holder did not rebut that presumption with evidence.
  • Comparing the designs from the informed user's perspective, the Division found the many shared contours, proportions, and component placement outweighed minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the contested EU design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 720 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvan PRANDZHEV
  • MemberIvo TSENKOV

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128157

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288