DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 015120538-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-09

000132105

Contested design: 015120538-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and registered EU design No 015120538-0001 is declared invalid; the holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0151205380001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jinbin Yuanvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Foshan, Guangdong, China

Holder · RCD owner

Hong Zheng

China (CN)

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Sach & Associates

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

ZoserX Massager by Aocesk — electric handheld/body-contact massager with four flexible legs

https://www.amazon.com, ASIN B0FL7KZ9LY; https://www.amazon.co.uk, ASIN B0FL7KZ9LY · amazon.com (05/08/2025); amazon.co.uk (01/09/2025) · disclosed 2025-08-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant (Jinbin Yuan) argued that the contested massager design lacks individual character in view of the 'ZoserX Massager' by Aocesk, disclosed on Amazon before the contested design's filing date (18/10/2025), with identical overall shape, four flexible legs, rectangular puffed top, metallic borders and control panel.
  • Holder did not submit observations.
  • The Division found the prior design disclosed on Amazon before the filing date; comparing designs from a single top view, the contested design shares the same rectangular top, control panel, metallic borders and extremities; no substantial difference in overall impression.
  • Application upheld; contested design declared invalid for lack of individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132124

vs Hong Zheng

2026-06-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288