DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024173-0007

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-09

R2254/2023-3

Contested design: 015024173-0007

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The Board annuls the contested decision, allows the application to proceed to registration with a filing date of 9 June 2023, and remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Annuls the contested decision. 2. Allows Community Design application No 15 024 173 to proceed to registration with the filing date of 9 June 2023. 3. Remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATIONvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

650 Madison Avenue, 10022 New York, United States

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 36(1)(c)Article 4(1)(e)Article 38(1)Article 4(1)(c)Article 46(3)

Argument summary

  • The design applicant argued that the original 9 June 2023 filings already met the representation requirements, so the Office should have kept that filing date rather than shifting it to 14 July 2023 after replacement views were filed.
  • There was no opposing private party; this was an ex parte appeal against the examiner's refusal to recognise the original filing date for the multiple Community design application.
  • The Board held that the initially filed images were suitable for reproduction and clear enough to identify the protected subject matter, and that the examiner gave no proper basis for demanding 'excellent quality'.
  • The appeal was upheld: the contested decision was annulled, the application was allowed to proceed with the filing date of 9 June 2023, and the case was remitted for further prosecution.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • Registrarp.o. M. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9