DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024173-0012

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-09

R2254/2023-3

Contested design: 015024173-0012

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The contested decision is annulled, Community Design application No 15 024 173 is allowed to proceed to registration with a filing date of 9 June 2023, and the case is remitted to the examiner for further prosecution.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Annuls the contested decision. 2. Allows Community Design application No 15 024 173 to proceed to registration with the filing date of 9 June 2023. 3. Remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATIONvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

650 Madison Avenue, 10022 New York, United States

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 36(1)(c)Article 38(1)Article 4(1)(e)Article 4(1)(c)Article 10(2)Article 46(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant appealed the refusal to accord the original filing date of 9 June 2023, arguing that the initial design images were suitable for reproduction and already showed all details clearly enough.
  • There was no opposing private party; this was an ex parte appeal against the examiner's decision on filing-date deficiencies in a multiple design application.
  • The Board held that the original computer-generated images satisfied Article 36(1)(c) CDR and Article 4(1)(e) CDIR because the designs were identifiable and their details could be clearly distinguished despite slight blurriness.
  • The appeal was allowed; the contested decision was annulled, the application kept the filing date of 9 June 2023, and the case was remitted for further prosecution.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • Registrarp.o. M. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9