DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024173-0013

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-09

R2254/2023-3

Contested design: 015024173-0013

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The contested decision is annulled, Community Design application No 15 024 173 is allowed to proceed to registration with the filing date of 9 June 2023, and the case is remitted to the examiner for further prosecution.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Annuls the contested decision. 2. Allows Community Design application No 15 024 173 to proceed to registration with the filing date of 9 June 2023. 3. Remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATIONvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

650 Madison Avenue, 10022 New York, United States

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 36(1)(c)Article 38(1)Article 4(1)(e)Article 4(1)(c)Article 46(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant appealed the examiner's refusal to accord the original filing date of 9 June 2023 to its multiple design application after replacement views were filed on 14 July 2023.
  • No holder or opposing private party was involved; the applicant argued the original images were suitable for reproduction and any quality objections should not have shifted the filing date.
  • The Board found the initial images sufficiently clear under Article 36(1)(c) CDR and Article 4(1)(e) CDIR; for design No 15 024 173-0013, the extra-elements defect under Article 4(1)(c) CDIR was remediable and did not affect the original filing date.
  • The appeal was upheld; the contested decision was annulled, the application kept the filing date of 9 June 2023, and the case was remitted for further prosecution.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9