DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024173-0027

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-09

R2254/2023-3

Contested design: 015024173-0027

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The Board annulled the contested decision, allowed the design application to proceed to registration with a filing date of 9 June 2023, and remitted the case for further prosecution.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Annuls the contested decision. 2. Allows Community Design application No 15 024 173 to proceed to registration with the filing date of 9 June 2023. 3. Remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATIONvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

650 Madison Avenue, 10022 New York, United States

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 36(1)(c)Article 38(1)Article 4(1)(e)Article 10Article 46(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant appealed the refusal to accord the original filing date, arguing the initial images were suitable for reproduction and clearly showed the designs.
  • There was no opposing private party; the appeal challenged the examiner's view that the representations lacked sufficient quality for a filing date.
  • The Board held the initial electronic images met Article 36(1)(c) CDR and Article 4(1)(e) CDIR because the designs were identifiable and their details clearly distinguishable.
  • The Board found 'excellent quality' has no legal basis, restored 9 June 2023 as the filing date, and remitted the application for further prosecution.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9