DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024173-0034

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-09

R2254/2023-3

Contested design: 015024173-0034

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The contested decision is annulled, Community Design application No 15 024 173 may proceed to registration with filing date 9 June 2023, and the case is remitted to the examiner for further prosecution.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Annuls the contested decision. 2. Allows Community Design application No 15 024 173 to proceed to registration with the filing date of 9 June 2023. 3. Remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATIONvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

650 Madison Avenue, 10022 New York, United States

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 36(1)(c)Article 38(1)Article 4(1)(e)Article 4(1)(c)Article 10(2)Article 46(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant appealed the examiner's refusal to keep 9 June 2023 as the filing date, arguing the original logo images already clearly showed the claimed designs and were suitable for reproduction.
  • No opposing private party; this is an ex-parte appeal concerning the filing date of a multiple Community design application.
  • The Board held the originally filed computer-generated images met Article 36(1)(c) CDR and Article 4(1)(e) CDIR because the designs were identifiable and all relevant details, including verbal elements, were clearly distinguishable.
  • It also held that design No 15 024 173-0013 involved a separate remediable defect under Article 46(3) CDR that did not affect the original filing date once corrected in time.
  • The appeal was upheld; the contested decision was annulled, the filing date was restored to 9 June 2023, and the case was remitted for further prosecution.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarM. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9