DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024173-0036

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-09

R2254/2023-3

Contested design: 015024173-0036

Appellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The Board annuls the contested decision, allows Community Design application No 15 024 173 to proceed to registration with a filing date of 9 June 2023, and remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Annuls the contested decision. 2. Allows Community Design application No 15 024 173 to proceed to registration with the filing date of 9 June 2023. 3. Remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATIONvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

650 Madison Avenue, 10022 New York, United States

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 36(1)(c)Article 38(1)Article 4(1)(e)Article 4(1)(c)Article 46(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the original 9 June 2023 filing date should stand because the initial images were suitable for reproduction and clearly identified the designs.
  • This was an ex parte appeal against the examiner’s refusal to accord the original filing date after replacement views were filed.
  • The Board found the initial digital images satisfied Article 36(1)(c) CDR and Article 4(1)(e) CDIR, and that “excellent quality” has no legal basis.
  • The appeal was upheld; the decision was annulled, the filing date restored to 9 June 2023, and the case remitted for further prosecution.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9