DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000607155-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-30

000010419

Contested design: 000607155-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design No 000607155-0002 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 000607155-0002 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Asian Gear B.V.via PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Conservenweg 30, 2371 DT Roelofarendsveen, die Niederlande

Represented by

Gravendeel Advocaten

Holder · RCD owner

Multimox Holdingvia PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Mariastraat 62, 5121JW Rijen, die Niederlande

Represented by

Kai Kohlmann

Prior art cited (1)

National design

Chinese design registration for a motor scooter in Locarno class 12-11

CN3568787 · State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China · disclosed 2006-10-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier Chinese design CN3568787 for a motor scooter.
  • The holder argued the application was inadmissible for res judicata and said the Chinese design was not properly proven or publicly disclosed before filing.
  • The Division found no res judicata, accepted the Chinese registration certificate and database extract as proof of disclosure on 11 October 2006, and rejected the holder's ownership objections.
  • Comparing the protected side views, the Division found the scooters created the same overall impression on the informed user despite minor visual differences.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), so the application was upheld and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberStephan HANNE
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAndré Gerd Günther BOSSE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.11

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidated126
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidated126
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidated126
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidated126
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidated126
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidated126
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidated126
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidated126