DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003487552-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-06-22

000010711

Contested design: 003487552-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003487552-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.

United States (US)

7477 East Dry Creek Parkway, Niwot, Colorado 80503, United States of America

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

MCK TRADE EU LTD

United Kingdom (GB)

Bexley Square 6, Salford, Manchester M3 6BZ, United Kingdom

Represented by

Jana Vandělíková

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCD

footwear

RCD No 001626300-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-10-23

Registered RCD

footwear

RCD No 002302000-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2013-09-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, arguing the contested clog design created the same overall impression as two earlier RCDs.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier RCDs had been validly disclosed and that the designer had sufficient freedom in clogs, making only meaningful visual differences capable of changing overall impression.
  • Comparing the contested design with the second prior design, the Division held the similarities dominated the minor differences, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028