DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001723677-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-06-26

000010580

Contested design: 001723677-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0017236770001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Inter Vion S.A.

Poland (PL)

Ostrombramska 91, 04-118 Warszawa, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

JMS Sports Sp. z.o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Piramowicza 11/13, 90-254-Lodz, Poland

Represented by

Aleksandra Młoczkowska

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

SwirliDo hair tie / telephone-cord-style hairband

SwirliDo or Swirlidon´t? · Nouveau Cheap blog · disclosed 2009-11-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested hairband design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier telephone-cord-style hair ties disclosed online and in product materials before the filing date.
  • The holder disputed public disclosure, challenged the reliability of blogs, catalogues and correspondence, and argued any third-party disclosure should be disregarded under the grace period.
  • The Division found the web and archive evidence sufficiently reliable to prove prior public disclosure of design D1 before the RCD filing date, and rejected the holder's grace-period defence.
  • Comparing D1 with the contested design, the Division found no material differences, held the RCD not new under Article 5, upheld the application, and declared the RCD invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128157

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288