DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002771816-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-06-28

000010653

Contested design: 002771816-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002771816-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Niche Product Sales LLC

United States (US)

578NW Merchantile Place, Port Saint Lucie 34896, United States of America

Represented by

Michelmores LLP

Charlotte Bolton

Holder · RCD owner

Nantong ANT Machinery Co. Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 280 Fuyuan Road, Economic Development Area of Qidong City, Jinagsu 226200, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

micro dumpers

RCD No 000718762-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2007-07-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 000718762-0001 for micro dumpers.
  • The holder argued the contested design was new and had individual character, and said the applicant had not properly invoked lack of individual character.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, rejected the novelty claim because the differences were not immaterial, but found the shared core structure decisive for overall impression.
  • Given substantial design freedom and only minor visible differences, the Division held the contested design lacked individual character and declared it invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128