DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003466671-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-08-07

000011010

Contested design: 003466671-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0034666710001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Burkhard Weiss

Austria (AT)

Kellerberggasse 5/B5, 1230 Wien, Austria

Holder · RCD owner

Weidu Xie

China (CN)

18E, Bldg. 8, Mingzhu Court, Longzhu Garden, Shenhui Rd., Longgang Dist., Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

CCTV Camera 3G GPRS GSM

ASIN B01N046B25 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-11-12

Web disclosureD2

52 Degree Game Camera Photo Case

ASIN B01IFG7LUC · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-07-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier Amazon-disclosed trail camera designs predating the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printouts for D1 and D2 as valid prior disclosures under Article 7 CDR but found the contested design was not identical to them for novelty purposes.
  • The Division held that the shared body structure and decoration dominated the overall impression, the differences were insignificant, and the contested RCD lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

16.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129117

vs QINGWEI LIU

2026-03-17REUD invalidated166
000130544

vs ShangHai Jheyewear Co.,Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidated166
000130342

vs AFFARGO LTD

2026-02-04REUD invalidated166
000125536

vs SHENZHEN AIXIANGPAI E-BUSSINESS CO., LTD

2025-02-07REUD invalidated166
000124135

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidated166
000124085

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidated166
000120389

vs Wenzhou Shengchu Trading Co., Ltd.

2023-06-05REUD invalidated166
000119600

vs Shenzhen Amtang Technology Co., Ltd.

2023-04-05REUD invalidated166