DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002755140-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-03

000011131

Contested design: 002755140-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002755140-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Volvo Trademark Holding AB

Sweden (SE)

c/o AB Volvo, 405 08 Göteborg, Sweden

Holder · RCD owner

Paalupaikka Oy

Finland (FI)

Kivirannantie 9, PL 19, 74101 Iisalmi, Finland

Represented by

vannetukku.fi Oy

Sirpa Rönkkö

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Volvo 'Pegasus' five-spoke car wheel rim

Turbobricks Forums; Volvospeed Forums; The Audi TT Forum; ipdusa.com; vrcf.fi · disclosed 2005-07-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity of the wheel-rim design for lack of novelty and individual character over the earlier disclosed Volvo 'Pegasus' wheel rim.
  • To prove disclosure, the applicant filed several pre-filing internet forum and website extracts showing the same five-spoke Pegasus wheel rim; the holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found the dated specialist-forum and website extracts sufficient solid and objective evidence that the Pegasus wheel rim had been made available to the public in the EU before the RCD filing date under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Comparing the designs, it held that the only difference was the prior design's letter 'R' on one spoke, an immaterial detail, so the contested RCD lacked novelty and had to be declared invalid.
  • The application was upheld and the holder was ordered to bear EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128