DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002223545-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-28

000011199

Contested design: 002223545-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002223545-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Beijing Jinyanchengxin Intellectual Property Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Zhichun Road, 1#-1, Room 908, Haidian District, Beijing City 100036, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Patent-Now

Dr.-Ing. Linda Nowack

Holder · RCD owner

Guoyu Quevia PDF extraction

China (CN)

4/F, No.1 Building, No. 100 Busha Buji, Shenzhen 518114, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Utility modelD1

flash lamp / flashlight

201120295839.4 · Chinese utility model registration · disclosed 2012-03-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier Chinese utility model D1 and a translated SIPO invalidity decision.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, the design corpus, or the applicant’s comparison of the designs.
  • The Division accepted D1 as disclosed before the priority date and found the novelty challenge failed because the differences were not immaterial.
  • The Division held the similarities dominated the overall impression, the designer’s freedom was not significantly constrained, and the contested design lacked individual character.
  • Application upheld; the contested RCD was declared invalid and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

16.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129117

vs QINGWEI LIU

2026-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130544

vs ShangHai Jheyewear Co.,Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130342

vs AFFARGO LTD

2026-02-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000125536

vs SHENZHEN AIXIANGPAI E-BUSSINESS CO., LTD

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124085

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124135

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000120389

vs Wenzhou Shengchu Trading Co., Ltd.

2023-06-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000119600

vs Shenzhen Amtang Technology Co., Ltd.

2023-04-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168