DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005508702-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-21

000103899

Contested design: 005508702-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0055087020001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LiaoYang Baile Health Care Products Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No.160-1 Liao An Road, Shoushan Liaoyang, 111200 Liaoning Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

CABINET CHAILLOT

Holder · RCD owner

Zhiliang Wang

China (CN)

No. 55, Group 6, Minzhu Village, Fenghe Town, Linshui County, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

IntellectPol IP Law Firm

Sławomir Krzysztof Nowicki

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

erotic articles

Community design registration No 0022123160002 · Community Design Bulletin · disclosed 2013-04-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 4Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier designs, relying in particular on prior Community design No 0022123160002.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity arguments undefended.
  • The Division found the earlier design had been validly disclosed and that both designs shared the same key composition, colours, handle layout and decorative elements.
  • It held that differences in the forked body shape and colours did not change the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberGaile SAKALAITE
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128157

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288