DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004741726-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-26

000101859

Contested design: 004741726-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el modelo comunitario registrado n.º 004741726-0001. 3. La titular sufrague las costas de la solicitante, cuantificadas en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Procase GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Im Bruch 2, 63897 Miltenberg, Alemania

Holder · RCD owner

ZCASE — Lukasz Zawadavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Racławówka 341/f, 36-047 Niechobrz, Polonia

Represented by

Katarzyna Sas

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureanexo 2

Facebook screenshots showing an earlier flight case design

Facebook · disclosed 2015-06-04

Web disclosureanexo 3

Facebook video screenshot showing an earlier flight case design

Facebook · disclosed 2016-02-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 5(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier flight case designs disclosed on Facebook by Audio Industry Scandinavia.
  • The holder disputed Internet availability of the prior video and argued visible differences and several features were new, distinctive, or technically driven.
  • The Division accepted annex 3 as prior public disclosure under Article 7 but found novelty unproven because the earlier design was not shown in enough views to establish identity.
  • It held the remaining differences were mainly technical or source-indicating, found the same overall impression on the informed user, and invalidated the RCD with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJOSE Antonio GARRIDO OTAOLA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038