DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004048429-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-04-17

000102719

Contested design: 004048429-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0040484290001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nino Roboticsvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

avenue de Montpellier 18, 34800 Clermont l’Hérault, France

Represented by

Marie Sonnier-Poquillon

Holder · RCD owner

Changzhou Airwheel Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 501-4, 9-1 Taihu Rd. E, Xinbei District, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213022, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Prior art cited (1)

International designAnnex 2

self-balanced personal transporter

DM/085317 · International Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-12-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant said the wheelchair design lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier transporter design and explained prior contacts with the holder about a joint all-terrain project.
  • The holder pointed to differences in the armrests, wheels, steering method and ergonomics, and denied that the compared designs created the same overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of international design DM/085317, rejected the novelty attack, but held that the shared seat, backrest, footrest, armrests and overall configuration dominated.
  • Differences such as the joystick, armrest details, wheel rims and colour did not change the overall impression, so the RCD lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJose Antonio GARRIDO OTAOLA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.12

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128