DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003423193-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-04-18

000103739

Contested design: 003423193-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003423193-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

MA Trading GmbH & Co. KG

Germany (DE)

Nimrodstr. 9, 90441, Nuremberg, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Brian Horowitz

United States (US)

16902, Von Karman St B 926060, Irvine (CA) United States of America

Represented by

Farago Patentanwälte

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

cart tyre tread pattern shown on a hand cart

ASIN B00V8IQ94Y · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-07-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the RCD lacked novelty because identical tyre tread had been sold on Amazon.de since 19/07/2016 under ASIN B00V8IQ94Y, supported by a manufacturer affidavit and invoices.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division admitted higher-quality duplicate images and found the Amazon extracts, read together with the affidavit, provided solid evidence that the earlier design had been publicly disclosed before filing.
  • Limiting the comparison to the protected tread pattern and proportions, the Division found the prior tyre design identical to the contested RCD apart from an immaterial perspective-related difference in tread direction.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 5, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.15

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128