DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002057620-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-05-14

000010902

Contested design: 002057620-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0020576200002 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Widmann S.r.l.

Italy (IT)

Viale dell’Industria 3/C, 20020 Busto Garolfo (MI), Italy

Represented by

Beiten Burkhardt

Holder · RCD owner

Worldwide Dynasty Inc.

United States (US)

20630, Superior Street, Chatsworth, California 91311, United States of America

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureprior design No 1

Black Resin Handlebar Moustache Novelty Pendant Necklace / moustache-shaped pendant with eyelets

ASIN B002MQ8O3A · Amazon.com; trendsixteen04.wordpress.com · disclosed 2009-08-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that only the moustache and eyelets shown in solid lines were protected and that earlier online disclosures destroyed novelty and individual character.
  • The holder argued the design had to be assessed as a whole, the internet evidence was unreliable or not reasonably known in the EU, and the prior products differed from a costume mask.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon and WordPress materials as proof of prior disclosure, treated the dotted-line glasses and chains as disclaimed, and compared only the moustache pendant and eyelets.
  • Because the earlier design created the same overall impression on the informed user, the contested RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028