DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002057620-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-05-14

000011006

Contested design: 002057620-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; RCD No 002057620-0005 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002057620-0005 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Widmann S.r.l.

Italy (IT)

Viale dell’Industria 3/C, 20020 Busto Garolfo (MI), Italy

Represented by

Beiten Burkhardt

Holder · RCD owner

Worldwide Dynasty Inc.

United States (US)

20630, Superior Street, Chatsworth, California 91311, United States of America

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

glasses with a moustache pendant marketed as 'Sunstache' and advertised through Urban Outfitters

www.mimiandchichi.com · Mimi & Chichi blog · disclosed 2011-12-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested costume-mask design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier disclosures of glasses with a moustache pendant.
  • Holder disputed internet disclosure, invoked Article 7(2) grace period, and argued the product indication and sector distinguished the contested design from the earlier designs.
  • The Division accepted the Mimi & Chichi web disclosure, found no proof that it was the holder's protected self-disclosure, and treated internet publication as prior art under Article 7(1).
  • Given the designer's broad freedom and the near identity of the compared glasses-and-moustache designs, the Division found no different overall impression and declared the RCD invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028