DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002057620-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-05-14

000011007

Contested design: 002057620-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002057620-0006 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Widmann S.r.l.

Italy (IT)

Viale dell’Industria 3/C, 20020 Busto Garolfo (MI), Italy

Represented by

Beiten Burkhardt

Holder · RCD owner

Worldwide Dynasty Inc.

United States (US)

20630, Superior Street, Chatsworth, California 91311, United States of America

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

'Sunstache' glasses with a moustache pendant advertised for sale through Urban Outfitters

www.mimiandchichi.com · Mimi & Chichi blog · disclosed 2011-12-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier disclosures of glasses with a moustache pendant, including a 6 December 2011 blog post.
  • Holder argued the contested design had to be assessed as a costume mask as a whole, challenged the reliability and EU visibility of the internet evidence, and invoked the Article 7(2) grace period.
  • The Division found the internet evidence sufficiently proved prior disclosure, and the holder did not substantiate that the disclosure was its own protected grace-period disclosure or unknown to specialised EU circles.
  • Given the broad design freedom and the close match in the glasses-and-moustache configuration, the contested design produced the same overall impression and lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberMichelle DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidated026
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidated026
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidated026
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidated026
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidated026
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidated026
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidated026
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidated026