DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001835208-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-09

000102119

Contested design: 001835208-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0018352080001 è dichiarato nullo. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla richiedente, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hair tools limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Head Jog House - Netherfield Road – Ravensthorpe, WF13 3JY Dewsbury, Regno Unito

Holder · RCD owner

Elchim S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Corso Indipendenza 5, 20098 Milano, Italia

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCDD1

hair dryer

RCD No 00685250-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2007-04-17

Registered RCDD2

hair dryer

RCD No 001697897-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2010-04-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier hair-dryer designs, chiefly D1.
  • The holder argued the informed user was a professional hairstylist, technical constraints limited design freedom, and the contested design differed in its nozzle, handle, ring, and rear details.
  • The Division accepted D1 as a prior disclosure, found the differences insufficient for novelty to fail only by immaterial detail, and rejected the novelty ground under Article 5.
  • The Division held author freedom remained broad and the contested design created the same overall impression as D1 on the informed user, so it lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128157

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288